Atheist Burgess-Jackson on the New Atheists.
Apparently he doesn't like the emphasis on non-rational persuasion.
Monday, November 19, 2012
An atheist on the new atheism.
Posted on 3:01 PM by Unknown
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Here is some discussion on Debunking Christianity. I had been in a discussion on a prior thread with Cole, who had argued that in the absen...
-
Parbouj has been making the complaint that Lewis, and those like myself who make use of his philosophical ideas, conflate atheism with mater...
-
Papalinton: However, the arguments providing epistemic support for atheism is growing as we speak. What remains in the wash, following the e...
-
Papalinton: Dawkins showed more than a modicum of wisdom when he intelligently noted, in paraphrase, "It [a debate] would look good on ...
-
This is a youtube video of a presentation given by Skype to the Belfast Reasonable Faith society.
-
Papalinton seems to be arguing as follows: 1. C. S. Lewis defended the view that there is a God, and that Christianity is true. 2. But C. S....
-
1. If there is no God, then all causation in the universe is blind, physical causation. 2. If that is true, then what everyone believes is ...
-
Here is Graham Oppys response to some Craig's claims about the Kalam argument. Grünbaum (1990) (1991) worries about the propriety of the...
-
This is in response to Alex Rosenberg's debate with William Lane Craig. Not mentioning any names, but this does seem to be a real probl...
Categories
- abortion (4)
- ad hominem arguments (4)
- AFR (7)
- Angus Menuge (1)
- anti-intellectualism (1)
- anti-religious propaganda (2)
- Aquinas (2)
- archaeology (1)
- argument from beauty (1)
- argument from confusion (1)
- argument from consciousness (1)
- argument from design (4)
- argument from desire (1)
- argument from evil (4)
- argument from intentionality (3)
- argument from martyrdom (1)
- argument from reason (12)
- argument from size (1)
- Arianism (1)
- Athanasuis (1)
- atheism (30)
- atheism and rhetoric (2)
- atheistic arguments (1)
- atonement (1)
- Balfour (1)
- Barack Obama (3)
- Bayesianism (3)
- Benedict XVI (1)
- Bertrand Russell (1)
- biblical criticism (1)
- biblical ethics (1)
- biblical inspiration (1)
- Bill Clinton (1)
- Buddhism (1)
- Bulverism (3)
- Bulverism. (1)
- burden of proof (3)
- business ethics (1)
- C. S. Lewis (21)
- C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea (1)
- campaign finance reform (1)
- capital punishment (2)
- capitalism (3)
- Catholicism (1)
- Christian apologetics (4)
- Christian philosophy (1)
- Christian socialism (1)
- Christianity (2)
- Christianity and Islam (1)
- christianity and politics (2)
- Chronological snobbery (1)
- church and state (1)
- classical theism (3)
- comments (1)
- communism (1)
- conservatism (4)
- contemporary miracles (1)
- conversion (2)
- cosmological argument (1)
- cosmological arguments (2)
- courtier's reply (1)
- creationism (1)
- critical rationalism (1)
- cultural relativism (1)
- cumulative case arguments (1)
- Daniel Dennett (2)
- Darwinism (2)
- death penalty (3)
- debates (1)
- deficits (1)
- defining evolution (1)
- defining faith (4)
- defining materialism (1)
- defining naturalism (2)
- divine command morality (2)
- Doctor Logic (1)
- Dualism (2)
- dwindling probabilities (1)
- EAAN (1)
- Easter (1)
- ECREE (6)
- eliminativism (1)
- embryonic stem cell research (2)
- epistemology (1)
- ethical relativism (1)
- ethical subjectivism (3)
- ethics (2)
- ethics without god (2)
- ethics without god. ethics (1)
- Euthyphro (1)
- evidence (2)
- Evolution (8)
- Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (2)
- exclusivism (1)
- fact and opinion (1)
- faith (3)
- Faith and Reason (2)
- fallacy of composition (1)
- fideism (1)
- fine-tuning argument (3)
- first way (1)
- five ways (1)
- flat earth (1)
- Francis Collins (2)
- free thought (2)
- free will (1)
- functionalism (1)
- fundamentalism (1)
- fundamentalist atheism (2)
- G. K. Chesterton (2)
- Gandhi (1)
- gay marriage (2)
- gnu atheism (1)
- God and goodness (1)
- god of the gaps (5)
- gun control (1)
- hallucination theory (3)
- hard determinism (1)
- Health Care (1)
- heaven (2)
- historical argument (3)
- historical reliability of the NT (2)
- Holy Spirit (1)
- homosexuality (1)
- Hume (4)
- ideologues (1)
- illegal immigration (2)
- inclusivism (1)
- indexicals (1)
- informal fallacies (2)
- intelligent design (10)
- intentionality (2)
- Islam (1)
- J. R. R. Tolkien (1)
- Jeffrey Jay Lowder (2)
- Joe Biden (1)
- John Loftus (13)
- just war theory (1)
- Kalam Cosmological Argument (3)
- Kant (2)
- Keith Parsons (4)
- liberalism (1)
- libertarianism (1)
- logical fallacies (1)
- logical problem of evil (1)
- love (1)
- Lydia McGrew (4)
- lying (1)
- materialism (5)
- mathematics (1)
- Mere Christianity (1)
- metaphysical naturalism (1)
- methodological naturalism (1)
- mind-body dualism (2)
- miracles (9)
- Mitt Romney (1)
- modalities (1)
- moral argument (3)
- moral objectivity (2)
- moral relativism (1)
- morality and religion (2)
- morality without God (1)
- Mormonism (1)
- multiverse hypothesis (1)
- Naturalism (6)
- near-death experiences (1)
- open theism (1)
- outsider test (5)
- P Z Myers (1)
- pacifism (1)
- paranormal (1)
- paranornal (1)
- Paul Ryan (1)
- Peter Van Inwagen (1)
- philosophy (2)
- philosophy of mind (3)
- physicalism (1)
- Plantinga (1)
- politics (3)
- prayer studies (1)
- pride (1)
- probability (1)
- problem of evil (3)
- property dualism (1)
- public education (1)
- purpose (1)
- qualia (1)
- reductionism (1)
- Reformed epistemology (1)
- relativism (1)
- religion and morality (3)
- religion and science (1)
- religious relativism (1)
- Resurrection (4)
- retributive theory of punishment (1)
- Richard Carrier (1)
- Richard Carrier (3)
- Richard Dawkins (7)
- ridicule (1)
- Robin Collins (1)
- Satan (1)
- scientific realism (2)
- Scripture (3)
- sexual morality (1)
- skepticism (1)
- Social Darwinism (1)
- socialism (2)
- socialized medicine (1)
- soteriological exclusivism (1)
- St. Thomas Aquinas (1)
- Steve Lovell (1)
- strong rationalism (1)
- Super Bowl (2)
- supernaturalism (1)
- Swinburne (2)
- the argument from asymmetry (1)
- the argument from evil (7)
- the argument from reason (15)
- the concept of God (1)
- the definition of faith (2)
- the new atheism (16)
- the outsider test (5)
- the problem of evil (3)
- the right to privacy (1)
- the Unmoved Mover (1)
- theism (4)
- theistic arguments (3)
- theistic explanations (2)
- Theodore Drange (1)
- theological voluntarism (1)
- theology and falsification (1)
- Thomas Nagel (5)
- Thomism (1)
- Thomistic Cosmological Argument (1)
- Tim McGrew (8)
- Trinity (2)
- Vallicella (2)
- vitalism (1)
- Wall Street (1)
- William Dembski (1)
- William Hasker (1)
- William Lane Craig (7)
- Winfred Corduan (1)
- young earth creationism (1)
- zombies (1)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(268)
-
▼
November
(26)
- Sauce for the goose
- Steve Hays on some implications of combining the m...
- Are logical laws true by convention?
- Any relevance for religious debate today???
- An ingredient of good dialogue with opponents
- Some Problems for Skeptics About the Paranormal, i...
- The New Atheists and the Dunning-Kruger effect
- Propaganda, Mockery, and Following the Argument
- An atheist on the new atheism.
- Lewis was right after all
- Another of Veale's Replies to ECREE, and a questio...
- Darwin's nominalism
- Doctor Logic, Placeholder Fallacy, and the footbal...
- More dialogue with Loftus on faith
- What are the social responsibilities of businesses?
- Ryan v. Biden in Thomist perspective
- Aquinas on the natural law, or how to avoid centur...
- McGrew on ECREE
- Author Meets Critic
- McGrew on Evidence
- Eggstraordinary claims require eggstraordinary evi...
- What DO they teach in those Catholic schools?
- The Stanford Encyclopedia on what beliefs are
- Loftus says he has no beliefs.
- Is there a Christian Left?
- Proof of heaven? Not so fast
-
▼
November
(26)
Powered by Blogger.
0 comments:
Post a Comment