mustbeageek
Thursday, October 25, 2012
A case against socialized medicine
Posted on 4:57 PM
by Unknown
Here.
What do you guys think of these arguments?
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to X
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest
Posted in
socialized medicine
|
No comments
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
Is there a general conception of God?
Here is some discussion on Debunking Christianity. I had been in a discussion on a prior thread with Cole, who had argued that in the absen...
The Naturalism thread redone
I am trying to get rid of an unsightly mess this post caused, so I am redoing it, with the comments included “ But if naturalism is true , t...
Blatant ad hominem?
Papalinton seems to be arguing as follows: 1. C. S. Lewis defended the view that there is a God, and that Christianity is true. 2. But C. S....
The Problem of Pain-for naturalists.
Steven Carr wrote: I really don't think Victor understands the argument from evil. Evil and suffering occur pretty much randomly. There ...
A quote from me about arguments and belief: why there are no silver bullets
“ The claim that one side or the other in some highly controversial issue as theism has a monopoly on rationality is thought by most philo...
The point I've been trying to make
I put this discussion on the DC boards. Semantics, not apologetics. I'm going try one more time to explain my beef. There is a differe...
The folly of scientism
Here. Advocates of scientism today claim the sole mantle of rationality, frequently equating science with reason itself. Yet it seems the ...
The hiddenness of God
This discussion, by Loftus, explains a typical atheist response on what good evidence for theism would look like to them. What it does is r...
Replying to the "Who Made God" argument against cosmological arguments
There are a couple of ways in which defenders of the cosmological argument can develop the argument so as to avoid the consequence of God ha...
The Rage of Unbelief
This is in response to Alex Rosenberg's debate with William Lane Craig. Not mentioning any names, but this does seem to be a real probl...
Categories
abortion
(4)
ad hominem arguments
(4)
AFR
(7)
Angus Menuge
(1)
anti-intellectualism
(1)
anti-religious propaganda
(2)
Aquinas
(2)
archaeology
(1)
argument from beauty
(1)
argument from confusion
(1)
argument from consciousness
(1)
argument from design
(4)
argument from desire
(1)
argument from evil
(4)
argument from intentionality
(3)
argument from martyrdom
(1)
argument from reason
(12)
argument from size
(1)
Arianism
(1)
Athanasuis
(1)
atheism
(30)
atheism and rhetoric
(2)
atheistic arguments
(1)
atonement
(1)
Balfour
(1)
Barack Obama
(3)
Bayesianism
(3)
Benedict XVI
(1)
Bertrand Russell
(1)
biblical criticism
(1)
biblical ethics
(1)
biblical inspiration
(1)
Bill Clinton
(1)
Buddhism
(1)
Bulverism
(3)
Bulverism.
(1)
burden of proof
(3)
business ethics
(1)
C. S. Lewis
(21)
C. S. Lewis's Dangerous Idea
(1)
campaign finance reform
(1)
capital punishment
(2)
capitalism
(3)
Catholicism
(1)
Christian apologetics
(4)
Christian philosophy
(1)
Christian socialism
(1)
Christianity
(2)
Christianity and Islam
(1)
christianity and politics
(2)
Chronological snobbery
(1)
church and state
(1)
classical theism
(3)
comments
(1)
communism
(1)
conservatism
(4)
contemporary miracles
(1)
conversion
(2)
cosmological argument
(1)
cosmological arguments
(2)
courtier's reply
(1)
creationism
(1)
critical rationalism
(1)
cultural relativism
(1)
cumulative case arguments
(1)
Daniel Dennett
(2)
Darwinism
(2)
death penalty
(3)
debates
(1)
deficits
(1)
defining evolution
(1)
defining faith
(4)
defining materialism
(1)
defining naturalism
(2)
divine command morality
(2)
Doctor Logic
(1)
Dualism
(2)
dwindling probabilities
(1)
EAAN
(1)
Easter
(1)
ECREE
(6)
eliminativism
(1)
embryonic stem cell research
(2)
epistemology
(1)
ethical relativism
(1)
ethical subjectivism
(3)
ethics
(2)
ethics without god
(2)
ethics without god. ethics
(1)
Euthyphro
(1)
evidence
(2)
Evolution
(8)
Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism
(2)
exclusivism
(1)
fact and opinion
(1)
faith
(3)
Faith and Reason
(2)
fallacy of composition
(1)
fideism
(1)
fine-tuning argument
(3)
first way
(1)
five ways
(1)
flat earth
(1)
Francis Collins
(2)
free thought
(2)
free will
(1)
functionalism
(1)
fundamentalism
(1)
fundamentalist atheism
(2)
G. K. Chesterton
(2)
Gandhi
(1)
gay marriage
(2)
gnu atheism
(1)
God and goodness
(1)
god of the gaps
(5)
gun control
(1)
hallucination theory
(3)
hard determinism
(1)
Health Care
(1)
heaven
(2)
historical argument
(3)
historical reliability of the NT
(2)
Holy Spirit
(1)
homosexuality
(1)
Hume
(4)
ideologues
(1)
illegal immigration
(2)
inclusivism
(1)
indexicals
(1)
informal fallacies
(2)
intelligent design
(10)
intentionality
(2)
Islam
(1)
J. R. R. Tolkien
(1)
Jeffrey Jay Lowder
(2)
Joe Biden
(1)
John Loftus
(13)
just war theory
(1)
Kalam Cosmological Argument
(3)
Kant
(2)
Keith Parsons
(4)
liberalism
(1)
libertarianism
(1)
logical fallacies
(1)
logical problem of evil
(1)
love
(1)
Lydia McGrew
(4)
lying
(1)
materialism
(5)
mathematics
(1)
Mere Christianity
(1)
metaphysical naturalism
(1)
methodological naturalism
(1)
mind-body dualism
(2)
miracles
(9)
Mitt Romney
(1)
modalities
(1)
moral argument
(3)
moral objectivity
(2)
moral relativism
(1)
morality and religion
(2)
morality without God
(1)
Mormonism
(1)
multiverse hypothesis
(1)
Naturalism
(6)
near-death experiences
(1)
open theism
(1)
outsider test
(5)
P Z Myers
(1)
pacifism
(1)
paranormal
(1)
paranornal
(1)
Paul Ryan
(1)
Peter Van Inwagen
(1)
philosophy
(2)
philosophy of mind
(3)
physicalism
(1)
Plantinga
(1)
politics
(3)
prayer studies
(1)
pride
(1)
probability
(1)
problem of evil
(3)
property dualism
(1)
public education
(1)
purpose
(1)
qualia
(1)
reductionism
(1)
Reformed epistemology
(1)
relativism
(1)
religion and morality
(3)
religion and science
(1)
religious relativism
(1)
Resurrection
(4)
retributive theory of punishment
(1)
Richard Carrier
(1)
Richard Carrier
(3)
Richard Dawkins
(7)
ridicule
(1)
Robin Collins
(1)
Satan
(1)
scientific realism
(2)
Scripture
(3)
sexual morality
(1)
skepticism
(1)
Social Darwinism
(1)
socialism
(2)
socialized medicine
(1)
soteriological exclusivism
(1)
St. Thomas Aquinas
(1)
Steve Lovell
(1)
strong rationalism
(1)
Super Bowl
(2)
supernaturalism
(1)
Swinburne
(2)
the argument from asymmetry
(1)
the argument from evil
(7)
the argument from reason
(15)
the concept of God
(1)
the definition of faith
(2)
the new atheism
(16)
the outsider test
(5)
the problem of evil
(3)
the right to privacy
(1)
the Unmoved Mover
(1)
theism
(4)
theistic arguments
(3)
theistic explanations
(2)
Theodore Drange
(1)
theological voluntarism
(1)
theology and falsification
(1)
Thomas Nagel
(5)
Thomism
(1)
Thomistic Cosmological Argument
(1)
Tim McGrew
(8)
Trinity
(2)
Vallicella
(2)
vitalism
(1)
Wall Street
(1)
William Dembski
(1)
William Hasker
(1)
William Lane Craig
(7)
Winfred Corduan
(1)
young earth creationism
(1)
zombies
(1)
Blog Archive
►
2013
(180)
►
September
(9)
►
August
(22)
►
July
(10)
►
June
(15)
►
May
(25)
►
April
(29)
►
March
(26)
►
February
(18)
►
January
(26)
▼
2012
(268)
►
December
(20)
►
November
(26)
▼
October
(30)
The Priority of Life-Rights Thesis
The ending to my Infidels paper on miracles.
How liberal is Obama?
Leaping over the evidence with a single bound
Immateriality and Intentionality
Who Made God and the Kalam Cosmological Argument
But how shall we follow probabilities?
Loftus on Silver Bullets
A quote from me about arguments and belief: why th...
A case against socialized medicine
Is evolution past its prime?
Turning Weinberg on His Head
Famine Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer
Why Republicans won't repeal Obamacare even if the...
Religion, Morality, and Kitty Wells
Would a Romney Victory Advance the Conservative Ca...
Win Corduan responds
Feser's Review of Rosenberg's The Atheist's Guide ...
J D Walters on Christianity and the Paranormal
WLC: Eastwooding Richard Dawkins
Corduan replies to Carrier on miracles
Omphalos and scientific realism
McCormick argues that a God who perfoms miracles w...
Surprisingness and evidence for supernatural occur...
Several definitions of evolution
Ruse on Humanism as a Religion
Maybe a discussion of socialism could go on this post
Atheism and lobbying
Was Kant anti-science?
Would a Limited God be Worthy of Worship?
►
September
(23)
►
August
(24)
►
July
(33)
►
June
(23)
►
May
(19)
►
April
(23)
►
March
(22)
►
February
(13)
►
January
(12)
►
2011
(52)
►
December
(22)
►
November
(28)
►
October
(2)
Powered by
Blogger
.
About Me
Unknown
View my complete profile
0 comments:
Post a Comment