This is a 1920s precursor to the argument from reason.
HT: Steve Hays.
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Here is some discussion on Debunking Christianity. I had been in a discussion on a prior thread with Cole, who had argued that in the absen...
-
I am trying to get rid of an unsightly mess this post caused, so I am redoing it, with the comments included “ But if naturalism is true , t...
-
Papalinton seems to be arguing as follows: 1. C. S. Lewis defended the view that there is a God, and that Christianity is true. 2. But C. S....
-
Steven Carr wrote: I really don't think Victor understands the argument from evil. Evil and suffering occur pretty much randomly. There ...
-
“ The claim that one side or the other in some highly controversial issue as theism has a monopoly on rationality is thought by most philo...
-
I put this discussion on the DC boards. Semantics, not apologetics. I'm going try one more time to explain my beef. There is a differe...
-
Here. Advocates of scientism today claim the sole mantle of rationality, frequently equating science with reason itself. Yet it seems the ...
-
This discussion, by Loftus, explains a typical atheist response on what good evidence for theism would look like to them. What it does is r...
-
There are a couple of ways in which defenders of the cosmological argument can develop the argument so as to avoid the consequence of God ha...
-
This is in response to Alex Rosenberg's debate with William Lane Craig. Not mentioning any names, but this does seem to be a real probl...
0 comments:
Post a Comment